I don't think we realize how dangerous the blurring of distinctions really is, until it shows up in our courtrooms and what was once an "observation" is now a "judgment" and finally "hate speech" with a punishment attached.
Thanks, and true. There is a very odd mix-total licence in one direction (if you have the right politics and identity, if you’re a favoured group, if somehow the antisocial thing you want to do helps the progressive cause) and total tyranny in the other direction (everything you do will monitored, controlled, made illegal). Many people don’t seen to realise that this anarchy-tyranny model is also being applied to sexual politics generally.
And I think what puzzles most of us is that, here in America, we have a Congress with members who are speaking out against this daily but doing nothing about it.
Why are we tolerating it? I find it hard to believe it's a majority opinion that's getting supported.
Well it gets more complex than that. We live in a vulgar age, a period of deliberate coarseness. Such things do lessen our humanity, and are linked to ugliness as you suggest. It takes a vulgar mind to love modern art and architecture, and a malign mind that wants to vulgarise the world to inflict modern art and architecture on us. The same applies in social rules. BUT at the same time doing real good excuses a lot of vulgarity, and I infinitely prefer crude honesty to smooth lies.
Wankers with souls — I think you’ve given anthropologists and socio-biologists the most succinct phrase yet by which to describe our species. Of course some of them will wince at invoking the notion of a soul.
I think she was sacked because she was a teacher first of all, and I agree with this decision - it's an inappropriate behavior for a teacher (especially if she teaches in a primary or even high school). If she was working in other area, no one would have cared I think.
Hypocrisy with regards to Woke 'queer' Pride Month is another issue - everything which should be rightfully condemned at any other instance is allowed on those events (like nudism and kink on the streets, etc.) So if this teacher was a Woke 'queer' one (which doesn't mean gay or lesbian by the way but indoctrinated into Woke gender cult), she would have gotten away with that and more, true.
But what's again the problem is that all kinds of perverts up to pedos use a protected minority group - gays and lesbians - as a shield against any criticism, that's why they're sneaking into LGBT+ community. The solution is that gays and lesbians cut ties with all this scum - and we're working on it, hence LGB Without the TQ+ movement - and pervs would lose their shield and go into oblivion again.
Yes I’m aware of the excellent work of those gays and lesbians who want to dissociate themselves from Pride and the extreme fetishes and revolting stuff. I agree both with protecting gays from mistreatment and protecting children from predators, and I think there’s a very easy societal balance to find there as decent gay people and decent straight people agree on protecting kids from predators targeting girls or boys. What we need is a shared return to the difference between the public and private spheres and the idea of innocence that deserves protection. Most normal people are there already, and have that view regardless of whether they are attracted to their own gender or the opposite gender. The people attacking innocence are either perverts or ideological maniacs (and many of them are straight).
Yeah, absolutely agreed. I think also some people, mostly men (either gay or straight) have hardships to see the difference between public and private and the Woke ideologues use them to push their sick agenda down on us.
Perfectly expressed, again.
I don't think we realize how dangerous the blurring of distinctions really is, until it shows up in our courtrooms and what was once an "observation" is now a "judgment" and finally "hate speech" with a punishment attached.
Thanks, and true. There is a very odd mix-total licence in one direction (if you have the right politics and identity, if you’re a favoured group, if somehow the antisocial thing you want to do helps the progressive cause) and total tyranny in the other direction (everything you do will monitored, controlled, made illegal). Many people don’t seen to realise that this anarchy-tyranny model is also being applied to sexual politics generally.
And I think what puzzles most of us is that, here in America, we have a Congress with members who are speaking out against this daily but doing nothing about it.
Why are we tolerating it? I find it hard to believe it's a majority opinion that's getting supported.
Vulgar behavior is an insult to beauty, and so is an insult to life.
Well it gets more complex than that. We live in a vulgar age, a period of deliberate coarseness. Such things do lessen our humanity, and are linked to ugliness as you suggest. It takes a vulgar mind to love modern art and architecture, and a malign mind that wants to vulgarise the world to inflict modern art and architecture on us. The same applies in social rules. BUT at the same time doing real good excuses a lot of vulgarity, and I infinitely prefer crude honesty to smooth lies.
Wankers with souls — I think you’ve given anthropologists and socio-biologists the most succinct phrase yet by which to describe our species. Of course some of them will wince at invoking the notion of a soul.
Yes, they would hate that but. The wank is fine. 😂🤔
I think she was sacked because she was a teacher first of all, and I agree with this decision - it's an inappropriate behavior for a teacher (especially if she teaches in a primary or even high school). If she was working in other area, no one would have cared I think.
Hypocrisy with regards to Woke 'queer' Pride Month is another issue - everything which should be rightfully condemned at any other instance is allowed on those events (like nudism and kink on the streets, etc.) So if this teacher was a Woke 'queer' one (which doesn't mean gay or lesbian by the way but indoctrinated into Woke gender cult), she would have gotten away with that and more, true.
But what's again the problem is that all kinds of perverts up to pedos use a protected minority group - gays and lesbians - as a shield against any criticism, that's why they're sneaking into LGBT+ community. The solution is that gays and lesbians cut ties with all this scum - and we're working on it, hence LGB Without the TQ+ movement - and pervs would lose their shield and go into oblivion again.
Yes I’m aware of the excellent work of those gays and lesbians who want to dissociate themselves from Pride and the extreme fetishes and revolting stuff. I agree both with protecting gays from mistreatment and protecting children from predators, and I think there’s a very easy societal balance to find there as decent gay people and decent straight people agree on protecting kids from predators targeting girls or boys. What we need is a shared return to the difference between the public and private spheres and the idea of innocence that deserves protection. Most normal people are there already, and have that view regardless of whether they are attracted to their own gender or the opposite gender. The people attacking innocence are either perverts or ideological maniacs (and many of them are straight).
Yeah, absolutely agreed. I think also some people, mostly men (either gay or straight) have hardships to see the difference between public and private and the Woke ideologues use them to push their sick agenda down on us.
In the past it was murder or rape, but now the greatest crime against humanity is to deviate away from the leftist cult.