Interesting read. I kind of came around to this view as well. I think common sense and straight reasoning is often missing in analyses. It's how I realised immediately that there was something amiss with the 'Palestine' narrative; a year's research confirmed my original suspicions, based on reasoning.
This case is an example. Look at this guy on the thread coming in and saying my research is poor and the mainstream line is correct. Based purely on the taqiyya activities of the killer and blindly accepting them as true because the authorities do (covering their own guilt). Basic common sense tells us that a ‘former’ Muslim using jihadi tactics to kill Christians isn’t a former Muslim at all, just as basic common sense likewise tells us that the people committing atrocities like Oct 7th attacks are the guilty and evil side of any resulting conflict.
Were I to be swept to power on the popular vote (a fond daydream), I would start by stopping all benefits of any kind to any unemployed non-native. I would then offer repatriation flights to those that decide to leave. I would enforce repatriation of all non-native prisoners. I would close all borders to anyone not married to or employed legally by a native. No benefits to any non-native who has not paid sufficient tax. No free NHS. I would leave the ECHR, the UN, Nato, WHO and ban all politicians and civil servants from public life if they had attended any WEF, Bilderberg or similar meeting. I would close all non-Christian places of worship (except the Sikhs because I like them and I have been swept to power). Any illegal arrivals would be given a cup of tea and then flown out to either wherever they came from or to Rwanda or maybe just guess their country of origin. No university would be allowed more than, say, 2% foreign students with no dependants and no right to remain. I would ban foreign ownership of anything in the UK unless they legally lived here permanently. And, without doubt, I'd close down all the net zero crap and look at rebuilding power stations and reopening coal mines. And I'd support small-scale farming in a big way.
That’s a good list. I’d ban Soros organisations. Leave all international agreements that demand asylum, end all asylum, increase the Navy and task them with returning dinghies to France. No welfare for anyone who hasn’t been resident for 10 years and paying taxes. Remove all race legislation that prioritises non citizens or immigrant groups. Ban signage in any public capacity that isn’t in English. Impose a compulsory national history curriculum in schools and universities that is patriotic. Make CRT and similar illegal.
I'd also ban all lobbying of politicians, remove pretty much all laws other than the obvious ones (so, no law about keeping chickens but a law about chicken welfare), make it a requirement that any politician has to have had a "proper" job out in the wide world for at least a decade (actually, include civil servants in that too). I'd stop funding universities that offer woke courses, turn the polytechnics back into polys and reintroduce practical courses for school leavers (lowering the leaving age to 16 again). Gosh - we should write a Manifesto!!!!
Sikhs. Love 'em. Integrate, take our culture on and keep theirs. Welcome immigrants. Our Sikh neighbours where I lived way back got me more pissed than I have ever been on Xmas D.ay. And I come from a hard-drinking family.
All of this terrorism is being allowed on purpose by the EU and WEF m*rxist billoinaries. I pray for some kind of super-resistance against the great invasion, but it seems too far gone in some places, like England and Germany.
With you all the way on this first-rate encapsulation of the situation!
How can one argue that the leaders of the West are acting in the interests of their citizens? Then whose interests do they represent? Even if they moved to reduce or even stop current immigration (entirely unlikely), it's far too late with current numbers already here to reverse the ongoing consequences to the daily lives of the indigenous populations, who are expected to submit to their fate without a murmur, or beware if they dare resist their fate! How ironic that the meaning of the word Islam is submission. Who is actually submitting?
What was he immediately before he got that status-an asylum seeker. He originally came to Germany claiming asylum. As for his criticisms of Islam, these are consistent with deliberate deception (taqiyya). So it’s not the research in my article that’s at fault, it’s your stupidity in advancing and believing the media and authority line. I can’t help people like you who WANT to be blind fools.
Dear Daniel, when a man is looking for a wife, what u call him? a seeker:
and if he has found one, what u call him, 8 years later ? husband, not seeker, right?
Better check the links i gave and find more and advance in information about that very special case;
the first idea seems to be that the perpetrator is just a psychological ill person. Further it looks like he got into a deep desillusion about real performance of German justice system. He found himself not respected,ignored and even betrayed.
But by far not enough to act like he did. I wait for results of further investigation to build my opinion.
By now I see no way to a plausible story to construct an Islamic-Terrorist out of him,
Brilliant article, thank you for writing it.
Thanks 😀
Copied in full and posted in its entirety on Basefook Daniel.
Top rated as usual!
Thanks Mick. 😀
Interesting read. I kind of came around to this view as well. I think common sense and straight reasoning is often missing in analyses. It's how I realised immediately that there was something amiss with the 'Palestine' narrative; a year's research confirmed my original suspicions, based on reasoning.
This case is an example. Look at this guy on the thread coming in and saying my research is poor and the mainstream line is correct. Based purely on the taqiyya activities of the killer and blindly accepting them as true because the authorities do (covering their own guilt). Basic common sense tells us that a ‘former’ Muslim using jihadi tactics to kill Christians isn’t a former Muslim at all, just as basic common sense likewise tells us that the people committing atrocities like Oct 7th attacks are the guilty and evil side of any resulting conflict.
What's the solution?
Were I to be swept to power on the popular vote (a fond daydream), I would start by stopping all benefits of any kind to any unemployed non-native. I would then offer repatriation flights to those that decide to leave. I would enforce repatriation of all non-native prisoners. I would close all borders to anyone not married to or employed legally by a native. No benefits to any non-native who has not paid sufficient tax. No free NHS. I would leave the ECHR, the UN, Nato, WHO and ban all politicians and civil servants from public life if they had attended any WEF, Bilderberg or similar meeting. I would close all non-Christian places of worship (except the Sikhs because I like them and I have been swept to power). Any illegal arrivals would be given a cup of tea and then flown out to either wherever they came from or to Rwanda or maybe just guess their country of origin. No university would be allowed more than, say, 2% foreign students with no dependants and no right to remain. I would ban foreign ownership of anything in the UK unless they legally lived here permanently. And, without doubt, I'd close down all the net zero crap and look at rebuilding power stations and reopening coal mines. And I'd support small-scale farming in a big way.
What else?
That’s a good list. I’d ban Soros organisations. Leave all international agreements that demand asylum, end all asylum, increase the Navy and task them with returning dinghies to France. No welfare for anyone who hasn’t been resident for 10 years and paying taxes. Remove all race legislation that prioritises non citizens or immigrant groups. Ban signage in any public capacity that isn’t in English. Impose a compulsory national history curriculum in schools and universities that is patriotic. Make CRT and similar illegal.
Ban all turtle-skinned old bastards such as Soros and Schwab
I'd also ban all lobbying of politicians, remove pretty much all laws other than the obvious ones (so, no law about keeping chickens but a law about chicken welfare), make it a requirement that any politician has to have had a "proper" job out in the wide world for at least a decade (actually, include civil servants in that too). I'd stop funding universities that offer woke courses, turn the polytechnics back into polys and reintroduce practical courses for school leavers (lowering the leaving age to 16 again). Gosh - we should write a Manifesto!!!!
Sikhs. Love 'em. Integrate, take our culture on and keep theirs. Welcome immigrants. Our Sikh neighbours where I lived way back got me more pissed than I have ever been on Xmas D.ay. And I come from a hard-drinking family.
Best, during the session - this...
"We love your pagan festivals"
Yes indeed - 'taqiya' seems to be missing from dimwit msm journalists' dictionary.
All of this terrorism is being allowed on purpose by the EU and WEF m*rxist billoinaries. I pray for some kind of super-resistance against the great invasion, but it seems too far gone in some places, like England and Germany.
This should be a Nuremburg Trial all by itself.
Sadiq Khan "Terrorist attacks are part of city life"
Me. "Not in Budapest or Warsaw, Sadders. How come?".
Merry Christmas, Daniel. Unto us a child is born"
With you all the way on this first-rate encapsulation of the situation!
How can one argue that the leaders of the West are acting in the interests of their citizens? Then whose interests do they represent? Even if they moved to reduce or even stop current immigration (entirely unlikely), it's far too late with current numbers already here to reverse the ongoing consequences to the daily lives of the indigenous populations, who are expected to submit to their fate without a murmur, or beware if they dare resist their fate! How ironic that the meaning of the word Islam is submission. Who is actually submitting?
weakly researched article! -- please reset and do it all again, use at least both links, where you find plenty of information to widen your ideas
https://rairfoundation.com/saudi-psychiatrist-exposes-germanys-active-operation-welcoming-jihadis/
https://x.com/DrTalebJawad/status/1823443639894466672
Look up 'taqiya'
Dr Taleb Jawad is
NO asylum seeker ( he got legal status in Germany in 2016)
NO Muslim, but Ex-Muslim, who sharpely critizes many Muslim practizes specially those concerning rights of women.
Watch his 40min lasting Video Interview by RAIR Foundation (see link above and scroll down)
What was he immediately before he got that status-an asylum seeker. He originally came to Germany claiming asylum. As for his criticisms of Islam, these are consistent with deliberate deception (taqiyya). So it’s not the research in my article that’s at fault, it’s your stupidity in advancing and believing the media and authority line. I can’t help people like you who WANT to be blind fools.
Dear Daniel, when a man is looking for a wife, what u call him? a seeker:
and if he has found one, what u call him, 8 years later ? husband, not seeker, right?
Better check the links i gave and find more and advance in information about that very special case;
the first idea seems to be that the perpetrator is just a psychological ill person. Further it looks like he got into a deep desillusion about real performance of German justice system. He found himself not respected,ignored and even betrayed.
But by far not enough to act like he did. I wait for results of further investigation to build my opinion.
By now I see no way to a plausible story to construct an Islamic-Terrorist out of him,
as it seems you wants to do.
You don't have the first understanding of islamic taqiyya do you?