Quite something to see Starmer openly refer to this series as a documentary! He even said he'd watched it with his children, so clearly had bought or certainly wanted to believe the narrative. And of course there were plenty around him who only weeks ago were clutching their pearls when Rupert Lowe was using some choice but accurate words in Parliament only too willing to egg Starmer on.
This is the circular insanity we are dealing with. They create the problem. Then they create a fiction deflecting from the problem. Then they use the fiction as reality and justification for the oppression of those who oppose the problem.
I’m not sure it’s even internally possible anymore. Every internal challenge gets destroyed or purchased and turned to the side of evil. I don’t want to black pill on this, but look at Reform and their refusal to be honest on deportations and mass immigration and their new Muslim Chairman. That’s supposed to be the rebellion movement? France and Germany both have more real opposition, but what happens if the AfD are banned or if Le Own is kept out forever despite taking most of the vote? I think the next stage is if a populist gets in anywhere, we see the same thing that was done in Romania. Will the people rise up? I'm not sure they ever will so long as saying nothing and not fighting back still secures any kind of life. The rape and crime will have to be affecting everyone before most people care, and at the moment there are still safer places to avoid it if you’ve got some money.
I agree that it has to reach the majority on personal level. I came to conclusion that it is what makes cognitive dissonance to flip from feelings to facts.
Yep. A little while ago they managed to find a white grooming gang. First one. They’d ignored all the Muslim ones, but were absolutely delighted to find the sole white one. We still have sick perverts of course, but it’s not culturally validated so it’s much more difficult for them to act in gangs, which is why our perverts tend to be loners or if it’s a pedo gang tend to be affluent sickos in some kind of institutional role that hides and enables their activities. The other side will also ignore disproportionate involvement in these things and focus on base numbers ignoring population levels, thereby pretending that white crimes of this kind are more common, when they aren’t.
We will only get a change of heart from Labour about this if an atrocity is committed which affects MPs or one of their children.
Having said that, even the killing of Sir David Amess in 2022 by Ali Harbi Ali, a British Islamic State sympathiser, didn't make a difference.
Ali was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole life order ... which wouldn't happen now with the new rules; he'd get 100 hours' community service and a new iPhone.
We will get a change of heart on this from Labour when the Muslim vote is sufficient for the Muslims to leave Labour and stand in their own party (Muslim Brotherhood?) and Labour no longer have anything to gain from pandering to them.
Will we, though? They're so ideologically entrenched that nothing short of major brain surgery would make a difference.
'White man bad', though not that many multicultural faces in the Labour government. Goven that white men predominate in a white Christian country, I simply don't understand how they justify the cognitive dissonance to themselves.
I think that the media and politicians are protesting too much and the normal mass of British people are very well aware that white boys are not going around killing anyone (or, at least, not unless they have proper mental health issues - which is very very rare). Normal people are well aware they were never asked if they wanted mass immigration of people from third world countries and they are well aware that these immigrants are dangerous, don't ever intend assimilating and don't even care that the rest of us are here. These men (and the physically dangerous ones are always male) are savages and the idea of mass re-migration/deportation is one that many, if not most, British people would approve of. Apparently, according to my daughters, only middle-class white boys who can't make eye-contact take any notice of Andrew Tate. They boys whose mothers hover over them and ruffle their Hugh Grantesque hair styles! White working class boys in rural towns (ie, not toxic London) who have fathers tend to be perfectly normal and nice.
Yes, and I believe it’s the fact that most of us know this stuff is propaganda that explains how this kind of psychological conditioning is always accompanied by censorship as well. One way or another you will be persuaded (the entertainment when it works) or coerced (the censorship) to accept the dominance of the false narrative.
I used to go to Warsaw Pact countries back in the day (lots of penfriends!). They never accepted the false narrative. They mostly ignored it, knowing it to be false. Didn't mean it went away but eventually it collapsed under the weight of it's own unimportance. All the obvious lies over the decades wore down even the original Communists so that eventually nobody believed any of it and simply lived their own lives. So long as you kept out of the eyeline of the authorities/police it was easy enough to do. They all seemed downtrodden to us in the west simply because they didn't have loads of flashy consumer goods.
This truly is a funked up world where fiction (Adolescence) is treated as fact. I wish Keir Stalin was fiction too, but know I have to live, yet protest against the fact.
Another outstanding piece Daniel. Thanks bro-dude 😉
What’s going to happen when all the future attempts to indoctrinate us have failed. The saying, you can fool some of the people all of the time has met its limit. They’ve maxed out. What will they resort to nexr? I’m sure we won’t like it
Great article. I can't believe Starmer is .. that Weak.
I mean, he actually shows that he doesn't give a fig about the people. If I had other countries calling my country a "rape capitol" .. I sure as hell would do something about it.
I know next to nothing about this media creation and yet I would bet $500 that the primary motivation behind its creation is to make the public not notice the problems associated with immigration, misandry, and the abandonment of Christian morality.
Quite something to see Starmer openly refer to this series as a documentary! He even said he'd watched it with his children, so clearly had bought or certainly wanted to believe the narrative. And of course there were plenty around him who only weeks ago were clutching their pearls when Rupert Lowe was using some choice but accurate words in Parliament only too willing to egg Starmer on.
This is the circular insanity we are dealing with. They create the problem. Then they create a fiction deflecting from the problem. Then they use the fiction as reality and justification for the oppression of those who oppose the problem.
💯
What will it take for Europe to elect “Trump-like” leaders?
I’m not sure it’s even internally possible anymore. Every internal challenge gets destroyed or purchased and turned to the side of evil. I don’t want to black pill on this, but look at Reform and their refusal to be honest on deportations and mass immigration and their new Muslim Chairman. That’s supposed to be the rebellion movement? France and Germany both have more real opposition, but what happens if the AfD are banned or if Le Own is kept out forever despite taking most of the vote? I think the next stage is if a populist gets in anywhere, we see the same thing that was done in Romania. Will the people rise up? I'm not sure they ever will so long as saying nothing and not fighting back still secures any kind of life. The rape and crime will have to be affecting everyone before most people care, and at the moment there are still safer places to avoid it if you’ve got some money.
I agree that it has to reach the majority on personal level. I came to conclusion that it is what makes cognitive dissonance to flip from feelings to facts.
Absolutely brilliant article x
Thanks Caroline 😀😀
The automatic echo chamber response to any fact based mention of any "minority" - "Yeah, but white people"...
Yep. A little while ago they managed to find a white grooming gang. First one. They’d ignored all the Muslim ones, but were absolutely delighted to find the sole white one. We still have sick perverts of course, but it’s not culturally validated so it’s much more difficult for them to act in gangs, which is why our perverts tend to be loners or if it’s a pedo gang tend to be affluent sickos in some kind of institutional role that hides and enables their activities. The other side will also ignore disproportionate involvement in these things and focus on base numbers ignoring population levels, thereby pretending that white crimes of this kind are more common, when they aren’t.
Love your stuff. Gonna buy that book. But I’m so fucking glad I’m old. I’d have already been in prison.
Thanks very much Alan, I really appreciate it. I know what you mean. The sorry for me is that I have young kids.
We will only get a change of heart from Labour about this if an atrocity is committed which affects MPs or one of their children.
Having said that, even the killing of Sir David Amess in 2022 by Ali Harbi Ali, a British Islamic State sympathiser, didn't make a difference.
Ali was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole life order ... which wouldn't happen now with the new rules; he'd get 100 hours' community service and a new iPhone.
If their children were on the line regularly they might change, but yes, the Amess murder saw them doubling down on the false narratives.
We will get a change of heart on this from Labour when the Muslim vote is sufficient for the Muslims to leave Labour and stand in their own party (Muslim Brotherhood?) and Labour no longer have anything to gain from pandering to them.
Will we, though? They're so ideologically entrenched that nothing short of major brain surgery would make a difference.
'White man bad', though not that many multicultural faces in the Labour government. Goven that white men predominate in a white Christian country, I simply don't understand how they justify the cognitive dissonance to themselves.
Well said!
I think that the media and politicians are protesting too much and the normal mass of British people are very well aware that white boys are not going around killing anyone (or, at least, not unless they have proper mental health issues - which is very very rare). Normal people are well aware they were never asked if they wanted mass immigration of people from third world countries and they are well aware that these immigrants are dangerous, don't ever intend assimilating and don't even care that the rest of us are here. These men (and the physically dangerous ones are always male) are savages and the idea of mass re-migration/deportation is one that many, if not most, British people would approve of. Apparently, according to my daughters, only middle-class white boys who can't make eye-contact take any notice of Andrew Tate. They boys whose mothers hover over them and ruffle their Hugh Grantesque hair styles! White working class boys in rural towns (ie, not toxic London) who have fathers tend to be perfectly normal and nice.
Yes, and I believe it’s the fact that most of us know this stuff is propaganda that explains how this kind of psychological conditioning is always accompanied by censorship as well. One way or another you will be persuaded (the entertainment when it works) or coerced (the censorship) to accept the dominance of the false narrative.
I used to go to Warsaw Pact countries back in the day (lots of penfriends!). They never accepted the false narrative. They mostly ignored it, knowing it to be false. Didn't mean it went away but eventually it collapsed under the weight of it's own unimportance. All the obvious lies over the decades wore down even the original Communists so that eventually nobody believed any of it and simply lived their own lives. So long as you kept out of the eyeline of the authorities/police it was easy enough to do. They all seemed downtrodden to us in the west simply because they didn't have loads of flashy consumer goods.
Really nice piece on this. Expressed a lot of the thoughts I’ve had since watching the show.
I’m still waiting to scroll past an essay from a radical feminist willing to look in the mirror as an exercise in understanding the show.
Thanks Craig. Yes I doubt we will ever see that exercise. It would be helpful, but it’s pretty unlikely to be forthcoming.
This truly is a funked up world where fiction (Adolescence) is treated as fact. I wish Keir Stalin was fiction too, but know I have to live, yet protest against the fact.
Another outstanding piece Daniel. Thanks bro-dude 😉
Thanks very much, and I share that wish regarding Keir Stalin.
Spot on. Excellent article.
Thanks Darrin. 😀😀
You lay it out well.
Thanks Carl. 😀
What’s going to happen when all the future attempts to indoctrinate us have failed. The saying, you can fool some of the people all of the time has met its limit. They’ve maxed out. What will they resort to nexr? I’m sure we won’t like it
Great article. I can't believe Starmer is .. that Weak.
I mean, he actually shows that he doesn't give a fig about the people. If I had other countries calling my country a "rape capitol" .. I sure as hell would do something about it.
Such a feckless leader.
My condolences.
I know next to nothing about this media creation and yet I would bet $500 that the primary motivation behind its creation is to make the public not notice the problems associated with immigration, misandry, and the abandonment of Christian morality.