I recently posted four QUOTES from Democrats in Congress specifically calling for violence. On Facebbok the post was covered and flagged as "misleading" - I guess Zuck's apology to Congress was short-lived. I'm glad to see you lay this bias out so thoroughly and agree with your conclusion. We've had enough of this.
You've nailed it. No one else seems to remember the Obama/Holder endorsements of violent "wilding" behavior that preceded Michael Brown's death after attacking a police officer.
Thanks. I think the Daily Beast did an article about Obama making Ferguson worse, but it’s certainly not something that hangs over him. It’s basically a non scandal like everything Obama because 90% of the media have a blanket refusal to criticise him. Obama was treated like the second coming of Christ in the media, the exact opposite of the treatment of Trump. He still is in most mainstream media.
Thanks. I think Patel and Bongino are honest. I’m less sure of Bondi. They are all still dealing with massive internal resistance though. I imagine 9 out of 10 of the staff available even after sacking the worst will still drag their feet.
Given the enormous damage he's wrought in the US, not to mention his declared intent to destroy it, I've often wondered why there's not a movement to remove Soros' citizenship as an enemy of the people.
To be honest I think this could have been shorter and more focused. I stopped reading about 2/3 of the way through and, as no point had yet been made, skipped to the end. Sorry to be blunt. I completely agree with your thesis.
No worries. Lengthier pieces aren’t for everyone. This piece is the perfect length for what I wanted to say, and every paragraph has a point. I’m no more influenced by people telling me the length an article should be, then I am by them telling me what it should say.
No fair enough. And I know you are a professional. For me there was too much history and detail on LoTT but maybe you are writing for an audience that is unaware of them.
I recently posted four QUOTES from Democrats in Congress specifically calling for violence. On Facebbok the post was covered and flagged as "misleading" - I guess Zuck's apology to Congress was short-lived. I'm glad to see you lay this bias out so thoroughly and agree with your conclusion. We've had enough of this.
Thanks Kay. I have done it at too great a length, apparently. 😂🤷🏻♂️
We live in a sound bites society.
Everyday reader thanks you.
You've nailed it. No one else seems to remember the Obama/Holder endorsements of violent "wilding" behavior that preceded Michael Brown's death after attacking a police officer.
Thanks. I think the Daily Beast did an article about Obama making Ferguson worse, but it’s certainly not something that hangs over him. It’s basically a non scandal like everything Obama because 90% of the media have a blanket refusal to criticise him. Obama was treated like the second coming of Christ in the media, the exact opposite of the treatment of Trump. He still is in most mainstream media.
Excellent. Still waiting for accountability. Why is this taking so long? Why can’t they finally go after Soros?
Thanks. I think Patel and Bongino are honest. I’m less sure of Bondi. They are all still dealing with massive internal resistance though. I imagine 9 out of 10 of the staff available even after sacking the worst will still drag their feet.
Thanks for answering. I hope we will see some progress soon. Why do you have reservations about Bondi?
The blanket also lies over Eric Holder, Louis Ferrakhan, and Keith Ellison, although the latter may become exposed.
True. They will all be criticised before Obama is.
An excellent analysis of a worrying trend.
Given the enormous damage he's wrought in the US, not to mention his declared intent to destroy it, I've often wondered why there's not a movement to remove Soros' citizenship as an enemy of the people.
The only country that has responded to Soros properly is Hungary, which effectively banned every Soros linked organisation.
The scourge of Consequentialism. https://open.substack.com/pub/beautifulinvisibility/p/the-presence-beneath-the-paving-stones?r=dw89a&utm_medium=ios
Absolutely.
To be honest I think this could have been shorter and more focused. I stopped reading about 2/3 of the way through and, as no point had yet been made, skipped to the end. Sorry to be blunt. I completely agree with your thesis.
No worries. Lengthier pieces aren’t for everyone. This piece is the perfect length for what I wanted to say, and every paragraph has a point. I’m no more influenced by people telling me the length an article should be, then I am by them telling me what it should say.
No fair enough. And I know you are a professional. For me there was too much history and detail on LoTT but maybe you are writing for an audience that is unaware of them.
Yes I can see the libs bit being boring for those who already know it all, but I wanted it to be for those who don’t know it too.
You did prompt me to this funny on FB:
“Anyone who wishes to critique my writing should understand that telling me my article is too long is like telling me my penis is too long.
I’m not going to be upset and I’m not going to cut anything off either.
I know the length and I’m very pleased with it.
Well, the writing, anyway.”
You’ll agree that’s more succinct? 😉
🤣🤣🤣