11 Comments
User's avatar
Bitter Klinger's avatar

Such a starkly simple, crystal-clear analysis! If I were teaching Political Science 101, this would be required reading. Provided, of course, that I was already tenured πŸ˜„.

Expand full comment
Jupplandia's avatar

Thanks, and that’s a wise proviso. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‰

Expand full comment
Carl Nelson's avatar

Good run down.

Expand full comment
Jupplandia's avatar

Cheers πŸ˜€

Expand full comment
Patricia's avatar

Well written and I agree. I listened to Steve Bannon being interviewed by GB News America's Steven Edginton the other day and Steve Bannon said regarding the deep state that he think MI5 and MI6 'drive a lot of the action' and they look at US intelligence agencies as being the school boys with much to learn or in his word 'British intelligence has always looked at US intelligence as a little bit of school boys that need to be learned up' so I wonder, what your thoughts are on the influence of British Intelligence in shaping the global agenda. They were, after all, much involved in 'Spygate' to discredit Trump and we must not forget the City of London and our offshore tax havens handle a good percentage of global wealth.

Expand full comment
Jupplandia's avatar

Thanks. I don’t think British intelligence controls US intelligence. I think all of the Five Eyes are now effectively one rogue organisation, none of them serve their nations or original purposes, and they exchange info and personnel for ops because they are also serving those financial interests and the globalist ideology.

So yes, people are right when they point to the City of London or MI5. But the reality is that these are things now based in Britain but not British in any real sense. Their aim isn’t British power, their loyalty isn’t to Britain. Britain just happens to be one of the nations they have most parasitised. It’s like those wasp parasites that can infect another insects brain and then control it whilst they hatch their young within it.

Actual British power and influence has declined all the time the City of London and our Deep State has flourished, because they aren’t serving us. Those financial institutions are based in England the way the UN is headquartered in New York-because they are latched on and feeding. That’s how you get all that money and power in London, and London being a third world shithole with a Muslim fanatic Mayor at the same time.

Our spies will act against Trump, but it doesn’t mean the Brits are in charge. It means the Brits are another globalist base, with less of Britain left in the equation than there is of the US left in the equation regarding your Deep State. Even saying β€˜your’ and β€˜my’ Deep State, saying US and UK, is somewhat inaccurate because it’s such a shared thing and so beyond being about US or UK interests in any meaningful way. We are talking about the same parasite.

Expand full comment
Patricia's avatar

Yes I agree. I don't believe for one moment the City or M15 are serving the interests of Great Britain or her people but I do get the impression they are at the forefront of the push for a one world totalitarian digital feudal system ruled over by the global elites where self sufficiency or freedom are impossible dreams for the masses.

Expand full comment
Jupplandia's avatar

True. The only thing slightly against that is that the WEF and UN seem to write the script that the intel agencies enforce, and Germany, Canada and Australia are all slightly further down the totalitarian digital feudal system pathway than the UK. The Canadian Online Harms stuff is worse than the UK one, Germany has more of this (I don’t know if you read eugypiuss, he’s excellent on that) and Oz was of course prepared to go further than the UK with Covid totalitarianism.

I definitely see the banking system/investment banks/money men as behind it and the intel agencies as their chief covert support, but it’s almost like the national labels that apply to us are just redundant when we talk about groupings of globalists.

Expand full comment
Patricia's avatar

Yes I do read Eugyppius' substack and I agree it is excellent. You make some good points about who is leading who. That is what I like about your writing - it is thought provoking. Bill Gates has fingers in every pie as does Soros. I think Mike Benz has some good insights into what is going on. Did you see his interview with Russell Brand?

Expand full comment