A brilliant piece of writing Daniel! Have you got this on FB? I keep getting mass reported and banned. For my Israel support I'm guessing 😂My boy walked in yesterday and said 'so, Putin is going to invade is he?!' I said actually no he isn't, sit right down and we will chat. I started off with explaining how easily the media had manipulated him. I then told him who actually wants war and it's not Putin-not with us. Now I will forward this to him. 👏
Thanks Donna. Yes a slightly smaller version is on my FB, this was one of the few I out on both places (I tend to do that when I think I’ve nailed it in a concise way). I hope your boy listens to you and not MSM. 👍
The truth told again. I would add another little but always useful “blame the Jews” excuse The powers have been trying it out with their “anti Zionist” campaign that includes sacrificing lives of innocent using Qatar money.
I haven't seen solid evidence on the limit of Putin's ambitions but I would be surprised if they went beyond the borders of the old Soviet Union. He appears to be happy having Belarus as a puppet regime so taking 30% of Ukraine and the rest not posing a threat may well be a satisfactory outcome for him.
I don't understand why European leaders think that placing any of their forces in Ukraine would be a good idea. However I also fail to understand how they think they can power a modern economy most effectively by a system of windmills located in the sea and providing intermittent supply.
None of their positions make any long term sense, they only work as short term actions that are versions of asset stripping. They have a global imperative based on the fact their destructive short term profit destroys places, so it has to have ever more expanding areas to capture. This is much more real impetus behind globslism then world conquest is behind Putinism. Putin is just a sphere of influence Russian nationalist.
excellent appraisal on the faux threat of a Russian invasion. As I see it, the E.U./U.S. covertly backed 2014 corrupt Maidan coup against the elected pro-Russian President, Yanukovych, was to pave the way for the corporate infiltration and occupation of Russia heralded by MacDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken fast-food outlets as the advanced Coca-Cola guard to undermine Russian culture and identity and buy-up Russia. Putin was the obstacle in the globalists plan and, predictably, he resisted the attempt by neutralising Ukraine.
Yes it all goes back to the Yeltsin era. The western money men thought they could buy up and take over Russia and exploit it in cahoots with oligarchs. That’s what Putin prevented. Then they tried to charm him and get what they wanted that way, and he still wouldn’t let them slice up his nation. That’s when the real hatred started. It has nothing to do with moral outrage at his actions or rule.
Ah, yes, I'd forgotten the oligarchs corrupt 'acquisition' of assets from the Soviet Union and Putin chasing them out of Russia or jailing them. I recently read Adam Zamoyski's book '1812: Napoleon's fatal march on Moscow' which is a reminder of the futility in attempting to defeat and occupy that huge and hostile land mass that, 150 years after, the sly politician but hopeless strategist, Hitler, had not learned from Napoleon's folly.
And here's the real problem. Maggots such as Starmer, Macron, and, yes, Obama and Biden, know that the absolute worst that will happen to them is election defeat, from which they will toddle off with their millions in ill-gotten gain. If only the consequence of their perfidy and treason was a quick walk to the gibbet. That would end this shite right quick.
An excellent assessment of the current world situation, Daniel. I hope that people will share this with as many others as possible. This is a concise , accurate description of what is going on and that's a hard thing to find.
I'm an American, and I have friends who gave me blank stares last year when I told them I could not vote for someone for President who was hell bent on getting us into a war with Russia. I am alarmed that "leaders" on your side of the pond are so far gone, and relieved somewhat by having a new President who's backing us away from the vortex.
I'm old enough to have a "Hell No, We Won't Go!" to brush off. And enough of a sense of history to be able to quip, "No Russki ever called me a TERF."
The history of Russian aggression over the centuries is undisputed. They need a real revolution to overthrow their puny crypto-czar so they can join the modern world.
Actually, it isn’t. Russians have a vast nation but have never pushed into Western Europe. Western Europe (Napoleon in 1812, Britain and France backing White Russian forces 1918-20, and then Hitler) has invaded them multiple times with devastating damage, which is why they are obsessed with a buffer zone. It’s true the Soviets grabbed Eastern Europe and historically the Tsars have ruled Poland, but that’s not a threat to France, Spain, Germany, the UK etc.
You're right. Just consider the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan in 1979 and interventions of Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1956. And the completely uneccessary building of the Berlin Wall 15 years after WW2 ended which separated families and stopped the flow of goods and services between the two Germany's.
What if the Eurobank spent all of Russia’s assets and they needed the war to justify it. As soon as Trump developed a strategy that controlled the assets, war became an emergency. They could have spent them in 2014, that’s why they kept “poking the bear”. They could fix the books & double spend it, it’s not like the Eurobank will be closed for fraud & we know no one will be prosecuted. It might close, but if the whole cabal that orchestrated this fiasco were the only people who were running global banking, then what? Just a thought.
Every year in May Vladimir Putin leads the Great Patriotic War Celebrations in Moscow in which Russians remember the sacrifice of 27 million of their relatives in achieving victory over Nazi Germany.
Putin's father fought against the Nazis and being a student of history he would know only too well the destructive nature of warfare.
It's unconsciousable therefore that he would wage an aggressive war against the Ukrainians who Putin refers to as being the same people as himself or his Fellow Slavic Brothers as he has stated.
A brilliant piece of writing Daniel! Have you got this on FB? I keep getting mass reported and banned. For my Israel support I'm guessing 😂My boy walked in yesterday and said 'so, Putin is going to invade is he?!' I said actually no he isn't, sit right down and we will chat. I started off with explaining how easily the media had manipulated him. I then told him who actually wants war and it's not Putin-not with us. Now I will forward this to him. 👏
Thanks Donna. Yes a slightly smaller version is on my FB, this was one of the few I out on both places (I tend to do that when I think I’ve nailed it in a concise way). I hope your boy listens to you and not MSM. 👍
You nailed it. 👏🏻
The truth told again. I would add another little but always useful “blame the Jews” excuse The powers have been trying it out with their “anti Zionist” campaign that includes sacrificing lives of innocent using Qatar money.
Yes that ones always useful. It’s the one being used in the US as we speak to try to turn a chunk of the Right mad and split them away from Trump.
I haven't seen solid evidence on the limit of Putin's ambitions but I would be surprised if they went beyond the borders of the old Soviet Union. He appears to be happy having Belarus as a puppet regime so taking 30% of Ukraine and the rest not posing a threat may well be a satisfactory outcome for him.
I don't understand why European leaders think that placing any of their forces in Ukraine would be a good idea. However I also fail to understand how they think they can power a modern economy most effectively by a system of windmills located in the sea and providing intermittent supply.
None of their positions make any long term sense, they only work as short term actions that are versions of asset stripping. They have a global imperative based on the fact their destructive short term profit destroys places, so it has to have ever more expanding areas to capture. This is much more real impetus behind globslism then world conquest is behind Putinism. Putin is just a sphere of influence Russian nationalist.
excellent appraisal on the faux threat of a Russian invasion. As I see it, the E.U./U.S. covertly backed 2014 corrupt Maidan coup against the elected pro-Russian President, Yanukovych, was to pave the way for the corporate infiltration and occupation of Russia heralded by MacDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken fast-food outlets as the advanced Coca-Cola guard to undermine Russian culture and identity and buy-up Russia. Putin was the obstacle in the globalists plan and, predictably, he resisted the attempt by neutralising Ukraine.
Yes it all goes back to the Yeltsin era. The western money men thought they could buy up and take over Russia and exploit it in cahoots with oligarchs. That’s what Putin prevented. Then they tried to charm him and get what they wanted that way, and he still wouldn’t let them slice up his nation. That’s when the real hatred started. It has nothing to do with moral outrage at his actions or rule.
Ah, yes, I'd forgotten the oligarchs corrupt 'acquisition' of assets from the Soviet Union and Putin chasing them out of Russia or jailing them. I recently read Adam Zamoyski's book '1812: Napoleon's fatal march on Moscow' which is a reminder of the futility in attempting to defeat and occupy that huge and hostile land mass that, 150 years after, the sly politician but hopeless strategist, Hitler, had not learned from Napoleon's folly.
And here's the real problem. Maggots such as Starmer, Macron, and, yes, Obama and Biden, know that the absolute worst that will happen to them is election defeat, from which they will toddle off with their millions in ill-gotten gain. If only the consequence of their perfidy and treason was a quick walk to the gibbet. That would end this shite right quick.
True.
An excellent assessment of the current world situation, Daniel. I hope that people will share this with as many others as possible. This is a concise , accurate description of what is going on and that's a hard thing to find.
Thanks Terry. 😀
QED Daniel !
Well argued.
Great post!
I'm an American, and I have friends who gave me blank stares last year when I told them I could not vote for someone for President who was hell bent on getting us into a war with Russia. I am alarmed that "leaders" on your side of the pond are so far gone, and relieved somewhat by having a new President who's backing us away from the vortex.
I'm old enough to have a "Hell No, We Won't Go!" to brush off. And enough of a sense of history to be able to quip, "No Russki ever called me a TERF."
Here’s an interesting take on European warmongering on Ukraine by geopolitical analysist Alex Krainer, linked on X to a similar (shorter) Promethean Action take: https://x.com/Wattman12603036/status/2001429145994059953?s=20,
on YouTube 'Bankrupt Europe hurtling to total destruction' amid 'warmongering' and Trump RIFT, well worth 48 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgx6S7WadEo.
Disaster is looming, we just don’t know exactly when and how.
The history of Russian aggression over the centuries is undisputed. They need a real revolution to overthrow their puny crypto-czar so they can join the modern world.
Actually, it isn’t. Russians have a vast nation but have never pushed into Western Europe. Western Europe (Napoleon in 1812, Britain and France backing White Russian forces 1918-20, and then Hitler) has invaded them multiple times with devastating damage, which is why they are obsessed with a buffer zone. It’s true the Soviets grabbed Eastern Europe and historically the Tsars have ruled Poland, but that’s not a threat to France, Spain, Germany, the UK etc.
You're right. Just consider the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan in 1979 and interventions of Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1956. And the completely uneccessary building of the Berlin Wall 15 years after WW2 ended which separated families and stopped the flow of goods and services between the two Germany's.
What if the Eurobank spent all of Russia’s assets and they needed the war to justify it. As soon as Trump developed a strategy that controlled the assets, war became an emergency. They could have spent them in 2014, that’s why they kept “poking the bear”. They could fix the books & double spend it, it’s not like the Eurobank will be closed for fraud & we know no one will be prosecuted. It might close, but if the whole cabal that orchestrated this fiasco were the only people who were running global banking, then what? Just a thought.
Every year in May Vladimir Putin leads the Great Patriotic War Celebrations in Moscow in which Russians remember the sacrifice of 27 million of their relatives in achieving victory over Nazi Germany.
Putin's father fought against the Nazis and being a student of history he would know only too well the destructive nature of warfare.
It's unconsciousable therefore that he would wage an aggressive war against the Ukrainians who Putin refers to as being the same people as himself or his Fellow Slavic Brothers as he has stated.
Win elections. Be too big to rig.
Correct.